Chris Ciovacco
“No QE3″, Retracement Level Stalls Financials
Since financial stocks make up 14% of the S&P 500 Index, it is difficult to sustain a rally without strength in banks and financial services firms. With the Fed and ECB opening up the liquidity fire hydrant in late December 2011, bank stocks experienced another in a series of monster bailout rallies. As outlined below, the Financials Select Sector ETF (XLF) may be poised to give back some gains over the coming sessions based on numerous factors including reduced odds of QE3.
Unfortunately in the debt-saddled world we live in, central banks may be the most important driver of asset prices. Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher told reporters after a speech Wednesday:
There will be no QE3. I will support no QE3, no additional mortgage-backed securities, no additional Treasuries. Wall Street keeps dangling QE3 out there – I think it’s a fantasy of Wall Street – it’s not going to happen, it’s not necessary.
As we outlined in a January 16 video, the Fed, via currency swaps, and the ECB, via unlimited three-year loans, are already keeping the money printers busy. While there is no formal QE, the Fed is still injecting new money into the global financial system in a “QE-like” fashion (see How QE Boosts Stocks).
It is not unusual for markets to hesitate at key Fibonacci retracement levels, such as 61.8%. Therefore, the comments below will take on more meaning if the financials ETF shows signs of a reversal. A close below 14.42 would increase the odds of more sustained weakness. The 61.8% retracement of the losses from the spring high to October low sits at 14.61 (see right side of chart below). One more push toward 14.91 would fit well into an intermediate-term topping process; the same can be said for an S&P 500 move toward 1,363. Continue reading
Fed To ‘Hold Off’ On QE 3
We noted extreme levels of optimism earlier today. What could possibly trigger a correction in stocks and commodities? If the Fed fails to signal and/or announce another round of quantitative easing (QE), it would undoubtedly leave the markets disappointed.
The Fed uses the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) as a medium to communicate with the markets. It is possible someone at the Fed picked up the phone and said, “We need to temper short-term expectations for another round of QE. Can you help us out?” Friday’s WSJ has an article titled “Fed Holds Off For Now on Bond Buys”. Notice the word “may” is not included. Here is the first paragraph of the article:
Federal Reserve officials are waiting to see how the economy performs before deciding whether to launch another bond-buying program.
The statement above is very direct; it does not contain “expected to” or “analysts believe the Fed will”. While anything can happen next week, the WSJ is always Continue reading
