Back in college, I thought the Value Added Tax (VAT) was a reasonable and fair tax model. It's major effects were felt by consumers so the more you consumed the more you paid. There were no taxes on savings or earnings... simply a tax on consumption. But wait, every time value is added to a product it is taxed, so that is a tax on production... which sounds reasonable at first until you realize that it is essentially a tax on Gross Domestic Product penalizing producers. Of course they will pass those taxes on to consumers through higher prices which will reduce consumption putting further stress on the economy.
Unfortunately, in addition to taxing everything an economy produces there is also more sinister side to the Value Added Tax, as the years since have shown. It is basically a hidden tax so it is very easy for governments to shake down it's subjects for an additional percent or two. And before you know it the VAT becomes a mill stone around the neck of the economy.
Imagine the government sucking 25% of the GDP out of the economy and you can see how disastrous this tax can become. Because that is exactly how the Value Added Tax works... it is a tax on Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
In the following article by Olivier Garret we can see how far Europe has traveled down the VAT road to serfdom and where the United States is headed. Tim McMahon, editor
U.S. Taxpayer Alert: We're About to Adopt Europe's Stealth "VAT" Tax Model
We're headed for a massive tax increase.
Federal spending is soaring at the same time that
individual income tax revenues have fallen to multi-year
lows. From their peak in April 2008, personal income
tax receipts have fallen by $232.1 billion, or 24.6%.
With few on Capitol Hill pushing for any significant
reduction in expenditures, massive tax increases become
inevitable. The challenge for the politicians is to
ratchet up the tax collections, but in the most politically
acceptable – i.e., non-transparent – fashion
possible.
The "value added tax"
fits that bill perfectly. In its simplest form, a VAT
is a tax on the creation of value. At each stage of
producing a product, from raw materials to fabrication,
to assembly, to packing and shipping, each company is
responsible for paying a tax on the value it adds.
As the VAT is always included in the retail prices,
and consumers never have to pay more at the cash register,
the tax increase would be hidden. In
fact, consumers would no longer see a sales tax at the
cash register. While that stealth will make a VAT seem "painless"
to many, it is also what makes it so dangerous.
(Although initially consumers would see massive price
increases in the cost of everything they buy. ~editor)
Most European countries introduced the VAT at rates
around 10% and quickly raised it to the upper teens.
Today most European countries have rates around 20%
(the only notable exception is Luxemburg at 15%).
Country |
Year Introduced |
Initial Rate |
Current Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Denmark |
1967 |
10% |
25% |
Germany |
1968 |
10% |
19% |
Spain |
1986 |
12% |
18% |
France |
1954 |
18% |
20% |
Ireland |
1972 |
16% |
21% |
Italy |
1973 |
12% |
20% |
Luxemburg |
1970 |
8% |
15% |
Netherlands |
1969 |
12% |
19% |
Sweden |
1969 |
11% |
25% |
UK |
1973 |
10% |
18% |
VAT rates have commonly been increased with hardly a
whisper from the media. And they don't always go up
in incremental single percentage points. Many European
countries have raised rates three or four percent
in one single year. In the case of Estonia, in 1993,
rates increased by 8%.
Before the widespread introduction of the VAT in Europe,
in the mid-1960s, the average tax collected by European
countries was only 27.7% vs. 24.7% of GDP in the U.S.
By 2006, the European tax burden represented 39.8% of
GDP vs. 28% for the U.S.
Put another way, in less than 50 years, Europeans have
seen their taxes increase by 44% as a percentage of
GDP, compared to slightly more than 13% in the U.S.
(Vastly increasing the United States' competitive
advantage. ~editor)
When the Bush tax cuts expire next year, income taxes
will increase from 35% to 39.6% for the top bracket
and from 33% to 36% for the next highest bracket. Further
increases will be politically charged or ineffective
in raising tax revenue significantly if applied only
to the "rich."
Revenue Implications of a Value Added Tax
A 1% increase in personal income taxes on the 33% bracket brings in a mere $12 billion over ten years. Taxing the top bracket by an additional 1% brings only $71 billion over 10 years. However, the Value Added Tax (VAT) will bring in an additional $1,242 billion over the same period. There's simply no comparison.
There is no question in my mind that the U.S. government will soon adopt this new tax and follow the lead of nearly 160 countries worldwide.
Can You Protect Yourself from the Value Added Tax?
Is there any way to protect yourself from the VAT?
Is there any investment angle you can use to profit
from its implementation? Unfortunately, the answer to
both questions is the same – no.
The only hope to avoid the Value Added Tax is if the
Democrats suffer serious losses in the mid-term elections
this November and the Republicans remember they are
anti-tax – leading to a political gridlock that
keeps any sweeping grab for new taxes off the table
for the time being.
Good investing,
Oliver Garret
Editor's note: Oliver
Garret is the CEO of Casey Research and a contributor
to Casey Report. Each month, Oliver and the Casey team
provide subscribers with the kind of investment analysis
you won't find anywhere else in the world.
Click here to learn about a risk-free
trial subscription to The Casey Report.
Use our custom search to find more articles like this
Share Your Thoughts