Three Myths of Deflation and Recession
February 4, 2009
This article is part of a
syndicated series about deflation from market
analyst Robert Prechter, the world’s foremost
expert on and proponent of the deflationary
scenario. For more on deflation and how you can
survive it,
download Prechter’s FREE
60-page Deflation Survival eBook,
part of Prechter’s NEW Deflation Survival Guide.
The following article was adapted from Robert
Prechter’s NEW
Deflation Survival eBook, a free 60-page
compilation of Prechter’s most important
teachings and warnings about deflation.
By Robert Prechter, CMT
Myth 1: “War Will Bail Out the
Economy”
Many people argue that war will bring both
inflation and economic boom. Wars have not been
fought in order to inflate money supplies. You
might recall that Germany went utterly broke in
1923 via hyperinflation yet managed to start a
world war 16 years later, which was surely not
engaged in order to inflate the country’s money
supply. Nor are wars and inflated money supplies
guarantors of economic boom. The American
colonies and the Confederate states each
hyperinflated their currencies during wartime,
but doing so did not help their economies; quite
the opposite. With respect to war, the standard
procedure today would be for the government to
borrow to finance a war, which would not
necessarily guarantee inflation.
If new credit
at current prices were unavailable, either the
new debt could not be sold or it would “crowd
out” other new debt. The U.S. could decide to
inflate its currency as opposed to the credit
supply. As explained in Conquer the Crash,
doing so would be seen today as a highly
imprudent course, so it is unlikely, to say the
least. If it were to occur anyway, the collapse
of bond prices in response would neutralize the
currency inflation until the credit markets were
wiped out. Despite these arguments, I concede
that war can be so disruptive, involving the
destruction of goods and the curtailment of
commercial services, that the environment from
the standpoint of prices could end up appearing
inflationary. To summarize my view, the monetary
result may not be certain, but an inflationary
result is hardly inevitable.
There is in fact a reliable relationship
between monetary trends and war. A downturn in
social mood towards defensiveness, anger and
fear causes people to (1) withdraw credit from
the marketplace, which reduces the credit supply
and (2) get angry with one another, which
eventually leads to a fight. That’s why The
Elliott Wave Theorist has been predicting
both deflation and war. You cannot cure one with
the other; they are results of the same cause.
Myth 2: “Deflation Will Cause a Run
on the Dollar, Which Will Make Prices Rise”
This is an argument that deflation will cause
inflation, which is untenable. In terms of
domestic purchasing power, the dollar’s value
should rise in deflation. You will then be able
to buy more of most goods and services.
It is unknown how the dollar will fare
against other currencies, and there is no
way to answer that question other than following
Elliott wave patterns as they develop. From the
standpoint of predicting deflation, the dollar’s
convertibility ratios are irrelevant. There may
well be a “run on the dollar” against foreign
currencies, but it would not be because of
deflation. I think the impulse to predict a run
on the dollar comes from people who own a lot of
gold, silver or Swiss francs. They feel the ’70s
returning, and so they envision the dollar
falling against all of these alternatives. If
deflation occurs, a concurrent drop in the
dollar relative to other currencies would be for
other reasons. Perhaps the dollar is overvalued
because it has enjoyed reserve status for so
long, which might make it fall relative to other
currencies. If this is what you expect, what are
you going to buy in the currency arena? The yen?
Japan has been leading the way into the abyss.
The Euro? Depression will wrack the European
Union. Maybe the Swiss franc or the Singapore
dollar. But these are technical questions, not
challenges to deflation or domestic price
behavior.
Myth 3: “Consumers Remain the Engine
Driving the U.S. Economy”
Only producers can afford to buy things. A
consumer qua consumer has no economic
value or power.
The only way that consumers who are not
(adequate) producers can buy things is to
borrow the money. So when economists tell
you that the consumer is holding up the economy,
they mean that expanding credit is
holding up the economy. This is a description of
the problem, not the solution! The more
the consumer goes into hock, the worse the
problem gets, which is precisely the opposite of
what economists are telling us. The more you
hear that the consumer is propping up the
economy, the more you know that the debt bubble
is growing, and with it the risk of deflation.
Robert Prechter, Chartered Market
Technician, is the world's foremost expert on
and proponent of the deflationary scenario.
Prechter is the founder and CEO of Elliott Wave
International, author of Wall Street
best-sellers
Conquer the Crash and
Elliott Wave Principle and editor of
The Elliott Wave Theorist monthly market
letter since 1979.
The Elliott Wave Financial
Forecast recorded an 18.5% gain
over the past 12 months, and is
the second-best performer over
the past year (of the
newsletters covered by Hulbert),
all while taking on less risk
than the broad market.
And right now, they're making a
special offer available to
InflationData.com readers.
you
can read all the details here.
|
|
|